Friday, April 27, 2007

Weekend of April 27th-29th, 2007


I wasn't even going to bother... but I wanted another topic for discussion.

Easily Next strikes me as the only real 'watcher' - and that's definitely a rental. For some reason I'm a total Nic Cage apologist (even in Ghost Rider at least he was being ludicrous) so I'll catch up with that at some point.

Meanwhile, Jamie Kennedy is one of the least funny human beings currently posing as a comedian (I place Carrot Top below him... and Pauly Shore above him), so obviously Kickin' it Old Skool isn't for me.

The Invisible I know, well, absolutely nothing about. I wouldn't even have known it was coming out were it not for Rotten Tomatoes.

And really, The Condemned is kind of shockingly appealing to me as a campy, incredibly dumb action-er. But I would never waste time heading to a theater to see it. And I might not even waste the time to rent it...

Bring on Spider-Man 3.

Monday, April 23, 2007

Scratch That (#1)


Back with a new topic for the week...

Pick a movie in any director or actor's filmography that you would like to simply erase. A movie that made you lose a little respect for that individual or that bombed so bad that it caused a career downward spiral that you wish had never had happened (or for any other reason you can think of). But just pick 1 film, because I hope this will be a recurring topic from month-to-month.

Oh, and just so you know Hook and Jack are disqualified from consideration, because they honestly never happened... no matter if you have warm fuzzy nostalgic feelings for them or not, they're not up for discussion.

My pick, in dishonor of his recent decision to become The Incredible Hulk is Edward Norton. Personally, I think he's too good an actor to be resorting to cheesy comic book movies directed by that Transporter guy and this has paycheck written all over it. But on top of that, Norton has been making a number of craptacular mainstream films due to commitments (The Italian Job) or the fact that he lost his damned mind (Red Dragon) and Hulk looks like a continuation of this trend.

However, my choice for the film to scratch out is Keeping the Faith. Edward Norton's directorial debut was a freakin' romantic comedy? Are you kidding me? And this is the film he chooses to follow up Fincher's masterpiece Fight Club with?

Now Keeping the Faith is hardly something to get riled up over. It's trivial. It's not terrible. But it seems so out of touch with what Norton does best (act?) that I can't believe he felt it would be a good idea. This is an actor whose best roles came in nihilistic tales, skinhead roles, or as a choir boy murderer. Plus, Norton seems like he'd be a natural for the director's chair, so when he chooses a project that required little effort or directorial touch, I scoff.

The main reason I want to erase Faith is to give Norton a second chance to debut his own film. Maybe that would have helped us avoid Dragon and The Italian Job. Hell, he's had the movie Motherless Brooklyn lined up for over three years as his follow-up in the chair... I've read that book. That should have been his debut. So when/if it ever finally opens, I'll brainwash myself into thinking it's only the beginning of the auteur part of his career.

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Weekend of April 20th-22nd, 2007

Another week spent waiting for the beginning of summer it seems... I can't remember a year that has drawn me in to the theaters less than this one. I've seen something like 12 movies from 2007 total, and only a handful of them have been in theaters. Really slim pickings thus far.

This weekend is no exception. The best choice seems to be either Fracture with Ryan Gosling and Anthony Hopkins or probably the consensus favorite, Hot Fuzz, from the Shaun of the Dead guys.

Personally, I liked-but-didn't love Shaun and haven't been over the moon about the awfully-titled Hot Fuzz. Meanwhile, Fracture became a whole lot less interesting with the casting of Anthony Hopkins in the killer role (obvious casting 101). Doesn't look like anything better than a rental in my estimation. I'd lean towards Hot Fuzz if I had to, but it looks like another weekend rummaging through my DVD collection finding something I haven't seen before. And to me at least, Vacancy and In the Land of Women look putrid.

Your thoughts?

Also, got a nice topic set for my next post, but I'm always interested in hearing what everyone is seeing... so I'm holding off for a day or two.

Sunday, April 15, 2007

The Promising Youth


In honor of Shia LaBeouf's #1 weekend with Disturbia, I thought I'd post a topic on the most promising young actors working today. The young actor who, in your mind, is good enough to carry a film by themselves. An actor whose filmography you look at to see what they're involved with. And also actors that have proven they have considerable talent in a relatively short period of time. Who's got your attention?

As a way of limiting the choices, I picked "Under 30" as the cut-off point. There are a large number of early 30s talents (Rachel McAdams, Cillian Murphy, Reese Witherspoon, etc. etc.) but I'd say they're in the prime of their career.

These guys are still a little green...

Anyways, I think the most obvious choice to this exercise is Ryan Gosling. Immensely talented and takes projects largely out of the spotlight. But Gosling is drooled over by just about everyone in the industry and out of it as the next big thing when or if he wants to chase it and honestly, he hasn't been in all that many good movies. Maybe it's just as impressive that he stands out even in average films like Murder by Numbers and The Notebook but I'm still waiting on the first Gosling film I truly love. Still, the films that have most highlighted his acting chops so far have to be Half Nelson and The Believer... both very good, but both also would have been trivial indies without him.

My current favorite is Joseph Gordon-Levitt. He sold me completely in Mysterious Skin, when I would previously have written him off as the kid from "3rd Rock" and 10 Things I Hate About You.... Then he does Brick and solidifies his place. I loved that film and Levitt's ability to transition from the charismatic character in Skin to the understated one in Brick was all that much more impressive. I've yet to get to The Lookout but because of him, I'm eager to see it. And that's the marker for this list, if one of these people is leading a film and it draws you in, he's on.

There were a couple of actors that, frankly, I was surprised were still under 30 as well. Gael GarcĂ­a Bernal, Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhall specifically. All three have me intrigued. Jake's probably the lesser of the talents, but his film choices make up for it. Hell, he's already got Donnie Darko, Brokeback Mountain and Zodiac on his filmography. Plus, I'll give him Jarhead - which really was sort of a disappointment, but still shows his interest in different themes.

Ledger should have won the Oscar for Brokeback (sorry Philip Seymour). Other than that, my second favorite performance of his actually came in the largely ignored Lords of Dogtown while buried under a stoned surfer get-up. Up until Brokeback though, I think he was drowning in throwaway films (yes, another 10 Things graduate, as well as Casanova, The Brothers Grimm, Ned Kelly, The Patriot and A Knight's Tale). Since then though, his next two projects have really grabbed my attention... Todd Hayne's Bob Dylan rumination I'm Not There and taking over the role of The Joker from Jack in The Dark Knight. So Heath's an example of an actor I didn't give a damn about and have done a complete turnaround on, all before his 30th birthday.

Others that stand out for me include Topher Grace whose In Good Company and Ocean's cameos have me convinced he'll breakout with Spider-Man 3, as well as "The Trio" Natalie Portman, Keira Knightley and Scarlett Johansson (although she needs more Lost in Translation and a lot less The Island). I was even very impressed with Q' Orianka Kilcher's one leading role in The New World.

And a number of others that could move up in the future but I'm not sold on yet include Shia, Mandy Moore, Ben Foster, Bryce Dallas Howard, Dakota Fanning, Anne Hathaway, Evan Rachel Wood, Michael Pitt, Emile Hirsch, Catalina Sandino Moreno and Elisha Cuthbert... whose probably better to look at than she is at acting.

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Weekend of April 13th-15th, 2007


Well, a bunch of films coming out again this weekend... but oddly, not a whole lot to choose from. I think I'd lean towards The Hoax as my first choice, but I'm not even a fan of Lasse Hallstrom's films.

Still, it might be the lesser of a bunch of evils here (I don't watch Aqua Teen so I can't judge, but otherwise, it's looking bleak).

Perfect Stranger - simply from its trailer - appears to be a throwaway film, but co-starring Bruce Willis it might eek out my second choice over the teenage remake of Rear Window starring Shia.

Thoughts? Or is everyone just seeing Grindhouse again before they split it in two (and if you haven't seen it yet, obviously go out this weekend and get your money's worth).

Monday, April 9, 2007

Overrated/Underrated #1: Robert Rodriguez

With the release of Planet Terror, I wanted to discuss the worth of director Robert Rodriguez in the first overrated/underrated segment on "The Film Script."

Obviously we all know the story about how Rodriguez broke in on the $9,000.00 production of El Mariachi and used the Audience Award at Sundance for that film to fashion a career in film.

He extended that movie into his own Sergio Leone-lite trilogy with Desperado and Once Upon a Time in Mexico and has had regular collaborations with Quentin Tarantino ever since Four Rooms in 1995.

But his most unequivocal success came when he discarded his DGA card and partnered with the previously anti-Hollywood Frank Miller for Sin City. So, if nothing else, Rodriguez can be thanked for luring Miller's graphic novels to the big screen.

But here's where we debate. Where does his filmography, which obviously includes some less-than-steller films like The Faculty, Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl, Spy Kids sequels - some of which I've never seen - where does it stand against a top tiered director?

Where does Rodriguez stand?

Overrated? Underrated?

Sunday, April 8, 2007

It's about Damn Time!



Finally a true horror film. After years of hearing about the Westboro Bapist Church, Kevin Smith's upcoming "horror film" entitled Red State will take the piss out of these evangelical pricks.

Westboro Bapist Church runs godhatesfags.com and godhatesamerica.com. They reside in Topeka, Kansas and only have a small community mostly made up of only a dozen families (God only knows how much incest is going on). Yet these hate mongers consistently get news coverage. They have protested soldier burials and the Katrina rescue because they believe that our acceptance of homosexuality in America is the cause of all the trouble in the world. Apparently every sin in the bible somehow stems from homosexuality. When a business man beats his wife in a coked up rage, its because of guys making out with each other. Whenever a woman is raped, its because that man actually is gay. When a terrorist flies a plane into the WTC, its because the whole building contained a whole mess of gays and the terrorist was doing God's bidding.

These people are just about the worst thing I can think of, and I'm so thrilled that Kevin Smith plans to rip them a new one. His film is based off their ideology and their head preacher Fred Phelps will be the basis for the "villain." It won't be your typical horror picture. Maybe know one actually dies. But it will show you something truly scary. These people are real. They have an agenda and they intend to see it through. The scariest thing for Smith is how these people manipulate the government into believing their beliefs. Ambitious horror film for sure.

No doubt they will protest it, but hopefully this will just promote the film that much more. No such thing as bad publicity right. This probably is a personal vendetta for Mr. Smith. His brother is gay, and I sure he wants to bury these people as much as I want to. I didn't really know what to make of Kevin Smith doing a horror film. I thought it would be a schlocky homage pic that he grew up with much like Grindhouse, but he thought outside the box. I'm excited not just because it is a Kevin Smith film, but because of the thought of just how pissed off these homophobic dicks will be when it is released.

Saturday, April 7, 2007

Only at the Grindhouse!!!


I've sat here for the last hour trying to put into words the amazing spectacle that was Grindhouse. It was an experience I don't know if I ever had nor will I ever have again. The aura that surrounded the theater was just right. The audience knew what they were getting in to. We were loud and boorish and vulgar. It was everything I could hope for. I really am struggling with my thoughts and emotions. Perhaps it would be best to let them settle. Get a good night sleep. Digest the buffet that Rodriguez and Tarantino just served you. Yet, in the spirit of Grindhouse, I won't be articulate. I won't be eloquent. I won't shower. Well perhaps tomorrow I will, but for now lets get dirty and talk Grindhouse.

Before I discuss the movies, let me just say that the faux trailers alone are worth the price of admission. Rob Zombie's is the weakest, but it still has its merits. In particular, a terrific cameo appearance from a superstar. Give you a hint, they have a baby named Kal El. Edgar Wright's was a brilliant parody of foreign movies marketed to American audiences. "Machete" could and should be a movie on its own. But my favorite was the one I saw on the net a week in advance. Eli Roth's "Thanksgiving" has it all. Boobs, blood, comedy, more boobs. "White meat. Dark meat. All will be carved." Since they are fake, they get to go all out and show you all the best bits. Normally I wouldn't want a trailer to spoil anything, but these are fake after all.

After Machete ends, Planet Terror begins. Let me get this out of the way, I've never cared for Rose McGowan. But after her first scene in this flick, she jumped into my celeb-to-do list. Rodriguez has done a brilliant job at recreating the grindhouse experience. The dialogue is so bad, its great. The gore is so over the top, its laughable. The music so bombastic, its appropriate. The plot is...oh who cares. Lots of stuff blows up. Lots of people die. Lots more stuff blows up. I had a terrific time with the movie, but to be honest all it really comes down to is a great parody. Perhaps parody isn't right, but when Rodriguez uses all the conventions of a grindhouse cinema including all the bad and turns it on its head for the sake of a joke, I would call that parody. However, don't mistake it, you can clearly tell he loves these types of movies, but at the end of it all it really was a terrific B-movie.

The best part of this flick though for me was Rose. Not just because she is beautiful, but she really is great in the movie. She sells it, and you do care about her character, Cherry Darling (great name). Not only can she emote, but she has a great sense of comic timing. She has some great quips that she gets to dole out. Freddy Rodriguez (no relation to the director) also gets his big break. The two of them make this much better than a B-movie should be. The supporting cast is also terrific including Michael Biehn (hope he gets more work after this), Michael Parks (he can chew any line apart and make it his), Tom Savini (legendary makeup artist for George Romero's "Dead" series), Josh Brolin, and Marley Shelton (Wendy Peppercorn!!!). I think this is Rodriguez' best movie. Sin City I credit more to Frank Miller than Rodriguez. Here he gets to unleash everything to create a visual thrillride with some killer lines. But it doesn't really stand apart from other zombie movies other than its over-the-topness, though that gun leg is brilliant.

Tarantino's "Death Proof" was the one I had the highest expectations for. I can remember vividly the first time I had seen any of his films. He is my favorite writer, and has really developed himself as a filmmaker. He outdoes himself here, at least on a technical level. His steady cam shots atop the car were so thrilling. I loved the little touch with the hood ornament. The car crash is one of the best edited and shot scenes I have ever seen. You get a sense of everyone involved and it gave Tararntino the one opportunity to let is inner gore fan out. The final car chase is immense. Not to sound cliche, but it really was a white knuckle ride..

Tarantino is known for resurrecting an actor's career. Here he brings back the Kurt Russell I know and love. Kurt's initial scenes develop a great sense of dread. It reminded me of the recent Zodiac, and just how palpable the tension was. Here Tarantino develops the same foreboding nature of the film much like Zodiac did, by refusing to show us what we wanted. Coming off the action packed Planet Terror, the audience probably wanted more of the same. But instead, Tarantino deliberately slows the film down in order to talk. Yes Tarantino's dialogue is back and I was glad to hear it. Because of the heavy dialogue, you get a real sense of depth to the characters without going into exposition as to how and why they are who they are. You grow to care for the characters, which makes the film all the more intimate and exciting to see the resolution. Speaking of resolution, everyone was cheering at the end. The movie ended right at the climax. No denouement. No epilogue. That's it. And it was brilliant.

The acting is even better here than it was in Planet Terror. Zoe Bell, a stunt woman in Kill Bill, gives a star making performance. To take someone who isn't an actor, and create a role so well suited for them, really is a testament to Tarantino's writing and directing. He casts whom he knows is best, not marquee names to fill the seats. All the girls are terrific in the movie. They all have depth and aren't simply a pretty face. Perhaps the reason why I loved this movie that much more than Planet Terror though was that Tarantino takes and uses what he loves about Grindhouse and leaves the bad behind. The dialogue isn't purposely bad. The visuals aren't hokey. There are hardly any film scratches or distortions. Tarantino seems to be playing on another field than Rodriguez. I can just imagine them screening their movies for each other and Rodriguez says "I though we were supposed to make a bad picture." Tarantino knows how to embrace what he loves, yet use it to his advantage and create art. Rodriguez made a film that was a whole hell of a lot of fun. Tarantino actually set out to make a great film. I can't wait for the extended cut of Death Proof.

There were some great in-jokes for fans of these guys past pictures too including Red Apple cigs, Big Kahuna and Son #1. Tarantino in particular seems to be creating a universe much like Kevin Smith did. Hopefully these films will be a success and expand upon that universe. The thought of another Grindhouse gets me giddy all over again. Now lets hear your guys thoughts. I know at least three of you guys saw it and I'm sure you can better illustrate your thoughts than I can. I'm thrilled from head to toe with what I witnessed today. Hopefully everyone will too.

Monday, April 2, 2007

Has "Lost" Lost It?


While this blog certainly focuses primarily anything and everything having to do with film, let us not forget the bastard cousin that seems to attract more and more screengoers away from the cinemas, TV.

I, like many others, have my set schedule for the week when I finally get to sit down at the boob tube. To list just a few of the drugs I take:
-24
-Prison Break
-South Park
-Veronica Mars
-Office
-Scrubs
-Heroes
-Entourage
and the one that I will probably OD on, Lost .

Lost has such a expansive and alluring plot. One so big that it would be impossible for them to play it out in the cinemas, yet it maintains cinema quailty. The acting, the direction, the music, all are just as good as you will see in any good theatrical experience. They dont have quite the budget for FX, so they can be a little hokey at times, but they do it better than any other show on TV.

The reason for this post though is not to attract new viewers, but to attract those that left. Season 3 keeps surprising me. Admittedly the first six episodes did start the show off slow, but the past five or six episodes have been some of the best stuff the show has ever put out. Yet all I hear about nowadays is not how great these last episodes have been, but just how poorly it is doing in the ratings compared to its once thriving self. Many are not patient enough to deal with the on-going plot that seems to just get more and more intricate. Many don't think they can wrap it up neatly and be able to explain it all. And than there are many who just simply like watching reruns of CSI: NY more. Let us not forget Lost is also the most Tivo'd show, which must account for something right.

I believe, when all is said and done, Lost will be remembered as one of the most satisfying experiences a viewer will ever have had or ever will. I have faith the writers know what they are doing. They are not in it for the money. They just want to tell a brilliant story. Talks with ABC are supposedly underway so they can discuss just how much longer Lost will go. The creators ideally wanted a 100 episode arc. With about 60 under the belt, there is still so much story to tell. Be patient. If you can't keep up with the show weekly, get the DVDs. DVD is what got me into the show to begin with. I promise you, anyone that has the patience to just appreciate the ride that Abrams and Company have created, you will justly rewarded in the end.

Sunday, April 1, 2007

State of the Site (#1)

Hey guys,


Just a real quick update on the state of the site.

First off, I'm loving it and I'm loving the discussion it's generating. The more people get involved, the better it is. I love the back and forth and the constant checking to see if other people have responded in the comments section, it's all gold. Pure movie talk gold.

Second, guys feel free to post whatever/whenever you want. I'm gonna start posting more topics (and shorter topics too) soon. Just simple reflections on a film, on an actor, or any of the number of possibilities I wrote in the "Posting" section for possible topics.

Third, "mr. mighty myth" and "the other TK" if you want to contribute to the site regularly, just respond to this post with your e-mail and I'll shoot you a permission to be a contributor. That way I don't have to keep moderating your comments before they're posted. I only really do that to keep out anyone who would just hit-and-run the site with something worthless or excessive cursing (moderate cursing openly welcome).

Fourth, I'm sorry I've slacked a little bit in recent days but I've been gearing up for a vacation. Tomorrow afternoon we're flying to Ft. Lauderdale for the week. I'll still try to check the site and offer some input briefly when I can during the days before we head out to the beach or something (as long as our hotel has an internet jack), but I'm posting in advance for the dearth of new material until I get back on Friday. As soon as I do though, I'll come back with a lot more stuff to discuss.

Besides, I'm sure everyone will be discussing Grindhouse for the next two weeks anyway and will barely notice...

And hey, why not start here? Are you guys looking forward to Grindhouse more or less than a standard Tarantino or Rodriguez film? Let's get some discussion going on this film. I'm absolutely dying to see it (although I'll probably miss it opening weekend unfortunately unless I catch it Sunday) but I don't know if I'm looking forward to it as much as, say, if this were Tarantino's Inglorious Bastards that we've all heard of for years. Anyways, discuss...

Blog Directory - Blogged