Friday, August 31, 2007

Finally!! Rescue Dawn and Sunshine!!!

















So I've been working on this for about a month now...and I think I have it just about right. I don't feel like working on it anymore, so if there are problems or inconsistencies....you can blow me. Enjoy!

Last week I got the pleasure of watching two of the best reviewed, and my own most anticipated, films of the summer. They are extremely different, so I have no way to tie them together other than the fact that they are independent dramas released in the summer (a rarity these days). But, the conversation to follow will be long, so I felt they deserved their own post.

First, Werner Herzog's Rescue Dawn. Starring Christian Bale, Steve Zahn, and Jeremy Davies, this is the true story of American POWs in Laos just prior to the Vietnam War. Bale stars as Dieter Dengler, a young Navy pilot whose first mission goes awry, leaving him stranded in the jungle, eventually to be captured. At the POW camp, he meets Zahn's Duane, who has been imprisoned for at least a year, and Davies' Gene, who has been there the longest around 2.5 years.

We meet their prison guards, whose nicknames, given to them by the prisoners, range from Lil' Hitler to Jumbo (who, as the only and ugliest Laotian midget I've ever seen, steals the movie). Dieter brings some hope to the prisoners, with talk of escape and possibly taking over the prison until the American planes and helicopters that fly overhead can be signaled. There is resistance at first, but eventually, due to a number of environmental, mental, and emotional factors, the necessity of escape becomes almost undeniable.

I won't go too much further into the plot, as from this point on, it really just comes down to escape and survival in the vicious jungles of Laos and Vietnam. The key to this film isn't the plot or the story, because in those regards, we've seen most of this before. The strength, as in almost all of Herzog's films, is the acting, and the director's almost criminally insane pursuit of realism.

First, we'll tackle the superb acting. By now, I think we all realize that Christian Bale is among, if not the, finest actor of his generation, and he continues that consistent level of talent here. Between his desire to inhabit a character and Herzog's desire to almost punish his actors with his methods, Dieter becomes real (he was real...just watch Herzog's 1997 documentary Little Dieter Needs to Fly), and his decisions and reactions are no longer scripted. His fear and his courage are almost tangible. Bale is the star of this film, and, without his talent, I think it would fall apart.

Steve Zahn...star of Saving Silverman and National Security...may deserve an Oscar. I've always liked Zahn, and always felt he was capable of so much more than he has done. Here, he finally proves that he has the dramatic chops I've always wanted him to have. He's still a sidekick here, but rather than being the stoned, dopey sidekick, he's the scared shitless, almost hopeless sidekick. It almost seems as if Dieter is there just to save this poor guy. His interactions with Dieter, and Gene in particular, show just how low this guy has fallen. He's barely hanging on. Not just physically, although that is a problem. His mind is almost gone. The year of being handcuffed, tortured, beaten, abused, starved, and constricted every night has worn him down until there's almost nothing left. Zahn uses facial tics and constantly darting eyes to express how his far his mind and humanity have been chiseled down. This isn't a flashy performance. Nothing in this film is. Zahn is at the brink of being completely pathetic. I can't help but feel that Herzog's insanity almost drove him to that stage, but you can see that Zahn gives everything he has, commits himself wholly to Herzog's madness. And the results are mesmerizing, eye-opening, and, above all, heartbreaking.

Finally, Jeremy Davies. Every review I read of the film just sort of tossed in a line or two basically saying, "Jeremy Davies plays the same role he has been mastering since the beginning of his career: the wimpy, whiny, weaselly wuss, and here he does it adequately." I'm going to have to go ahead and disagree with the mass populace of critics. Davies is certainly most well-known for his turn as the wimpy, whiny, weaselly wuss of a translator in Saving Private Ryan. I've always stood up for that film, and for his role. He's a tragic pussy. He shouldn't be fighting. He's a translator. He's not meant to be out there trying to save one man amongst a few million. Yet, when he stands by and doesn't stop the German soldier from going up the stairs to brutally kill Adam Goldberg's character, you cannot help but hate how cowardly he is. He starred in that film, opposite some amazing actors, and held his own. Here, he does it again. His character was a pilot doing recon over Laos. He has been in the prison longer than anyone else, and it shows. He still has the wimpy factor that we'd expect, but he brings a fierce madness to the role that I didn't expect. He's cocky. He's been there longest, and knows how things are done. He knows that escape, or even thinking of escape is stupid. Their only hope, according to him, is that the war will never start, and they will be rescued or negotiated for. He fights with Duane and Dieter every step of the way. When the plans are finally set, he goes along, mostly because he knows he'll die if he stays. His following actions are never fully explained. There is no closure. I love the last scene he has. It really wraps up his character nicely, but never wraps up his fate, which will bother some.

Now to talk about the humanized form of insanity that is Werner Herzog. If you know anything about the man, you know what I am speaking of. He dragged a steamboat over a mountain. He ate his own boot. He almost shot his best friend and favorite actor, Klaus Kinski. He was accidentally shot in London last year, and, later that week, pulled Joaquin Phoenix out of his burning car after an accident. I know. It doesn't sound real, but it's true. But what makes him even more unreal, is the ways he tries to illicit realism from his actors. Here, he takes that to an extreme. Zahn lost 40 pounds for his role. God only knows what Bale lost (going from The Machinist to Batman Begins to Rescue Dawn the to The Dark Knight...his body's going to kill him). I'm convinced Herzog locked Jeremy Davies in his basement for 2 years, letting him only eat what he could find. He ties Bale's legs together, and drags him behind a bull (really). He covers Zahn and Bale in leeches (really). I think he made Zahn and Bale both shit their respective pants on film. I honestly can't recall everything that he put these actors through, but you can tell through their performances that he put them through hell. It shows, and it makes the film better. Their performances feel more authentic because of it, and that authenticity is what this film relies on.

Overall, if only for the performances and fine direction, I cannot recommend this film enough. But, I will warn you, the last five minutes of it, absolutely suck. They feel so out of place. They belong in another movie, and it left a very bad taste in my mouth, to the point where I had to wait a week before I could write this. Most won't find this in theaters (sadly), but I would say it is definitely worth the rental price.

Second, let's talk about Sunshine. If you thought that last review was long, you might want to go get a snack...some pudding would be nice...yes...go get a snack pack, then come back. Actually, eat one snack pack, and bring a second one with you...it's going to be a long trip.

I love Danny Boyle. He always makes fucking awesome movies. Rather he makes two-thirds of a fucking awesome movie, then kinda goes a bit crazy and sort of loses his focus. So, this review will have at least four distinct parts. I will discuss the first two-thirds of the film, a spoiler-free discussion of the last act, a spoiler filled discussion of the last act, and an overall look at the film.

First, let's talk about the first two acts. It's simple, and can be summed up thusly...absolutely wonderful. Granted...Boyle does borrow heavily from other Sci-fi films. Solaris and 2001: A Space Odyssey are combined to form the very base of this story. The sun is dying. We sent a space vessel with a huge fucking bomb attached to jump-start it. They failed. No one knows why. We took every last bit of the Earth that we could, and built another space vessel/bomb and sent it up. It's this crew that we follow. The Earth is in an Ice Age, and all will die if they are not successful. The failure of the first ship casts a giant shadow over the hope that this one will be successful. We first meet the crew just before they are to lose all communications with Earth.

The crew is truly an international affair. Almost every corner of the planet is represented, but very rarely do any cultural differences cause problems, or are even mentioned. You can look up the full cast yourself, but the three that stand out in my mind are Cliff Curtis, Chris Evans, and Cillian Murphy. Cliff Curtis has been acting since the beginning of time, or so it seems. He normally pops up a few times a year playing a cop or a military man in the background, has a few lines, then disappears. He's the first crew member we see here. We hear Murphy's voiceover narration, as we circle the ship. The first scenes inside the ship are in the gorgeous sun room, which is a room in which the crew can view the sun safely behind super-powerful filters. Curtis's Searle, who is the ship's psychologist, is bathing in the beauty of the sun from behind those filters. He wants to experience it as fully as he can, and asks the ship, named Icarus, to turn the filters down as low as is safe. As the film progresses, we watch as his addiction to the sun worsens. His justifications for his addictions are interesting, but, after the twist of the story has occurred, we see just how serious the implications of it could be. It's hard for me to discuss this character without mentioning the twist, and how the story progresses after it. I will discuss Searle more later on. Curtis brings an interesting psychosis to what could have been a very one-dimensional character. His addiction at first seems superficial, but ends up being so central to the story that its initial oddness and near innocence are, by the end, nearly removed from our consciousness.

Chris Evans. I know. He chooses shitty movies. But, I've always argued that he had a lot of charisma, and could be a damn good actor if he stayed away from things like Fantastic Four. Here, he finally fulfills that prediction. He's fierce. He's oddly likable. He knows what needs to be done, and does it. Not just his character...I mean Evans. He knows that the drama on the ship, whether it be between shipmates or just the whole humanity's last hope thing, has to be totally believable in order for the film to work. He wholly trusts Boyle, and allows him to tame his intensity and charisma to make his character believable. He's a dick, but the kind of dick that you know will save your ass one day. And because of this, he's not only invaluable, but he's likable. It's a great change of pace for Evans, and, hopefully, one that he takes to heart (and hopefully turns down Fantastic Four 3).

Cillian Murphy rocks hard almost all the time. He continues his tradition of awesomeness here with a performance that showcases his known strengths, but never really pushes him beyond what we've seen before. He's heady, but not irritatingly brainy. He's sarcastic, but not a prick. He's strong, but believably so. Murphy's strength has always been a quiet, reserved intensity, and here he's almost at his best. I would have liked to have seen some stretching on his part, but that certainly doesn't make any less of a great role for him.

The first two acts set up a great, claustrophobic, incredibly tense atmosphere that never lets up from the beginning on. It's similar to the aforementioned films, because, as the film progresses, the inevitable disasters begin to pile up. A human error leads to disaster, and, as the destruction and body count piles up, the near hopelessness of their cause becomes more and more apparent. That is until they find the first ship. I'm not going into the full details of they're encounter with the Icarus I, but Boyle does a fantastic job of building tension throughout the sequence. The set design within Icarus I is just great. What happens as a result of this run-in with Icarus I sets up the entire tone for the last act of the film, which I think I'll talk about now.

Spoiler-free first. As the crew that have survived thus far continue to work out how they can complete their mission, the Danny Boyle-patented third act mind-fuck begins to show its ugly mug. Before the film came out, I read a ton of reviews, most of which said the same thing: "It's great until the last act, which is so out-of-nowhere that it almost ruins the film." I think that's an exaggeration. The last act does come out of nowhere. It doesn't make much sense. The other thing I had read a lot was that it contained a spiritual/supernatural element that you would either go along with or just jump off it for good. This is perhaps where I was most disappointed. The thing that makes this act so out of place, while supernatural, doesn't really seem to have much to say. It's pointless. It's just another obstacle for the crew to overcome to reach their goal. It's a plot device, not a revelation.

I will discuss what I wish they would have done in the spoiler section to follow. Despite it's irrelevance, I stuck with the film after this event took place, and it was definitely worth it. There are very few directors that can use just an image, just visuals to evoke emotions so strong that it brings you to tears. Mulligan mentioned Terrence Malick a few posts back, and I think he is one of the few. I know that many weren't fans of The New World, but I happened to have loved it. The plot or story wasn't hinged so much on the dialoge as much as it was on the images Malick captures. The serenity of this "new world" and how it would soon be tainted by those who considered it new. Last year, Darren Aronofsky did this feat again in The Fountain. The closing scene of the cosmonaut flying into the dying star were among the most breath-taking images I've ever seen on film. Here, the finale, with Cillian Murphy attempting to set off the big-ass bomb in time, is almost as amazing looking as The Fountain, and, as much as I didn't care for that thing in the last act, it is truly cathartic.

Spoiler Alert!

So, what pissed me off, and how could they have done it better? After they debacle on the Icarus I, some strange stuff begins to happen on the Icarus II. People start dying, things start getting sabotaged, and the Icarus II computer is reading that there is 1 more life form on board than there should be. Turns out that the life form is the supposed to be dead, and definitely insane, captain of the Icarus I. During his crew's mission, he spent tons of time in the sun room, soaking himself in sunlight (much like Searle). There, he heard the voice of God tell him that mankind's time is up, so, he kills his crew and spends the next 6-7 years in the sunroom becoming a lovely shade of charred flesh. Now, he's on the Icarus II trying to sabotage their mission for his God.

My problem with this story line is the supernatural aspect. This guy lived in a sunroom for 7 years?!?! Just the look of him took me out of the story a bit. Worse is that his supernatural-ness and his spiritualness bring nothing to the film. They aren't presented in a manner that makes the film more intelligent or philosophical. They just don't make much sense really. I wish they would have done a similar story line with Searle. The two characters have the similar addiction to sunlight, so why couldn't Searle have been driven mad by it. We aren't forced to accept the stretch that is the Icarus I's captain, but we still get the drama of space-madness. And, if they had wanted to delve into the religious aspect still, they could have gone more in depth and given us a better idea of the philosophy they wanted to portray. There simply isn't enough time that late in the film for any of it to sink in and make sense. Perhaps a slow build through Searle would have given them a better opportunity to explain some of the more complex philosophical and religious thoughts they wanted to get across, but didn't.

Also, while in spoiler mode. The scene of immense beauty I was writing about a few paragraphs up was when Murphy detonates the bomb just as the radiation from the sun had reached that exact spot. The two forces opposing each other on either side of Murphy. Just breath-taking.

End Spoilers!

So...it's time to wrap this long ass post up. The film as a whole? Damn good, if slightly disappointing. Boyle is a visual master. His cinematography is spectacular. His use of color and shadow is wonderful. Unfortunately, he and screenwriter Alex Garland have a tendency to over-complicate or just totally jump off track towards the end of their films. The only other problem I had with the film was the soundtrack. As times, it felt very manipulative. At others, it was so loud and blaring that it was hard to hear the dialogue at the time. It's a minor complaint that may have just been the theater I saw it in, but it was bothersome a few times throughout. Despite these flaws, the first two acts, the fantastic acting, and amazing visuals make this a must see for sci-fi fans, Boyle fans, and just film lover's in general.

Monday, August 27, 2007

In the Screening Room - Joel Schumacher's
Falling Down


Session 005 - Falling Down

Who saw it and what are your thoughts on it?

Monday, August 20, 2007

Engagement Announcement

Because I can, I wanted to post a notice simply saying that Kelly and I got engaged over the weekend. I couldn't be happier and couldn't be looking forward to marrying her more.

But that's enough sentimental stuff. I also saw Superbad over the weekend and I can't help but be lovin' some McLovin. Chachi come back so we can discuss. I have to admit though that at this point in the year, I've totally turned around on my previous statements about how it was a lazy year. With summer additions to my Top 10 such as Superbad, Knocked Up, Ratatouille, The Lookout (caught up with it on DVD over the summer), Hot Fuzz (early summer) and Bourne Ultimatum... the year is shaping up quite nicely (and I never expected the summer movie season to be this year's saving grace, I sit here shocked).

Friday, August 10, 2007

Bourne: The Best Action Franchise Ever?


It’s been nearly a week now since I saw The Bourne Ultimatum and I’ve wavered between saying that the Bourne series is the Best Action Franchise Ever…

Or if it’s just the Best Franchise Ever.

I’ve decided to scale it back to my first classification, but that it even warrants mention in the second is something significant and kind of spectacular. In the end, I just couldn’t put it above some of the great film franchises of all-time such as The Godfather series (although III drags it down, something Bourne doesn’t have) or Lord of the Rings. I would, however, put it above Star Wars due to consistency (6 films, only 3 of which were good vs. Bourne’s 3-for-3). I know that's sacrilege, but I honestly don't care... I'm a Star Wars fan but not a Star Wars fanboy.

Anyways, turning to the Action Franchise aspect of the debate there isn't too much competition for the role as “Best Action Franchise Ever.” Although, compiling these franchises has made me interested in another Film Script Top 7 - Best Franchises (stay tuned for that soon and start compiling your own lists). Plus, it's also hard to classify some franchises (does The Terminator series fit in or is it strictly sci-fi? Alien was sci-fi, but Aliens was sci-fi/action, so where does it belong? Is Beverly Hills Cop primarily comedy? Should comic book series count? What would you consider The Man with No Name series?)

There are a handful of contenders, including Rambo, RoboCop, Mission Impossible, Dirty Harry, James Bond, Mad Max, Indiana Jones, Die Hard and Lethal Weapon.

I’m throwing out Rambo, RoboCop and Mission Impossible right from the start. While successful, I don’t think anyone regards these films as stellar, even in the genre. They’re fun (sometimes), but really nothing exceptional. And while I like the original Rambo, First Blood quite a bit… both sequels are just dreadful. And (as much as I hate to admit) I’ve never seen a RoboCop film, but the only one I expect to take slack for is the first one… which I will catch up with at some point, but one decent-to-good film does not make a franchise.

Then I’m going to get rid of Dirty Harry, James Bond and Mad Max. Mad Max because I honestly don’t like the series all that much – I don’t even think The Road Warrior is all that great. Bond and Harry are gone because they overextended themselves. Too many ups and downs in the series (much like Star Wars). Sure both might have three films in them (Dirty Harry, Magnum Force, Sudden Impact) (Goldfinger, Dr. No, Casino Royale) that stand up, but we’re taking the series as a whole… and when we do that they lose a lot of points for the lower rung sequels (The Dead Pool) (Any Pierce Brosnan Bond film).

That leaves the three big challengers, Die Hard, Lethal Weapon and Indiana Jones. I can lose Indiana Jones because it’s more adventure than action anyway (although the difference is very small) and though Bourne doesn’t have a single film to rival Raiders of the Lost Ark, I think Temple of Doom and The Last Crusade are fun but ultimately don’t hold up as well either. Bourne is more consistent. It’s good from minute one of film 1 until the final credits roll on film 3. Indiana Jones – if you classify it as action – might be the films that could most claim the Best Action Franchise crown… but by extending the genre limits to even include it, I have to add Terminator too and then I think I give Terminator the crown in that case anyway.

Finally, I don’t think either Die Hard or Lethal Weapon hold a candle to Bourne either. They’re a somewhat more respected series than RoboCop and Mission Impossible, mostly because the original films are considered classics of the genre whereas MI and RoboCop may not be, but taking in all 4 of each as 1 collective whole? You lose points. I don’t even remember Lethal Weapon 3 and I wish I could forget 4. And Die Hard I do remember each, but they’re ridiculous when you think about it. I think Kelly’s comparison of Die Hard to “24” is stunningly accurate, because after each film in Die Hard they seem to reboot with a new day, a new bad guy and the same lead character – much the same as Jack Bauer. Individually, they’re fine. The first one is great. The others are entertaining. But they’re not a continuous storyline like Bourne. I don’t think they’re as well acted either (come on, look at the string of brilliant actors in the Bourne series… even besides Damon, we get Franka Potente, Julia Stiles, Clive Owen, Chris Cooper, Brian Cox, Joan Allen, David Straithairn, Paddy Considine and Albert Finney).

Plus, there’s no mugging for the camera. There are no one-liners that need to be said each film. It’s all reliant on Jason Bourne being smarter and more clever than his would-be captors. Bourne’s character is on a mission with a clear ending to get to. The enemy is always the same, it’s Bourne vs. the Government. You’re not throwing him into a new ludicrous situation in each film just so you can make the movie. Most of all, they make sense.

Admittedly, the original storyline is not that interesting (amnesia victim, really?) but they toss that aside quickly in the original and get on with it. They embrace the idea and go with it and by the end of the film you’re not thinking about the amnesia gimmick anymore.

And that they’re brilliantly entertaining only seems to be a side effect. That's why it's my choice for Best Action Franchise.

Who dares disagree?

Sunday, August 5, 2007

Blaxploitation Marathon

One of Mulligan and I's favorite podcasts is Filmspotting. An on going tradition of the show is to catch up on a series of films, all related by genre, director, etc, they have not yet seen.

As you may have noticed in my previous posts, they just wrapped up their Film Noir marathon. Well up next is a genre that doesn't get enough respect yet demands it. Films with conventions that no other holds. A style that defined an era, yet holds relevance for today's audience. DeNiro himself, wished he could have been apart of this revolutionary era of poetry, harmony, and love. I of course refer to the genre that bitch slaps other genres...BLAXPLOITATION.

As we precede with our Screening Room sessions, I will also try to fit in these six films that many are deemed as Movies You Must See Before You Die. There are no set dates for discussion. I will post about them or at least mention them in our monthly Recent Watches. If you want to play, by all means join in the discussion, but if not, that is cool too,..just not nearly cool as Dolemite is.

1. Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song ('71)
2. Shaft ('71)
3. Superfly ('72)
4. Coffy ('73)
5. Foxy Brown ('74)
6. Dolemite ('75)

Saturday, August 4, 2007

In the Screening Room - Wong Kar-Wai's
Days of Being Wild



Session 004 - Days of Being Wild

Who saw it and what are your thoughts on it?

Friday, August 3, 2007

Recent Watches: August 2007

Caught up with a couple 2006 movies, a 2007 and one that was remade in 2007 - but I saw the original. I'll get right into it since I wrote practically a dissertation on every one of 'em.

Hairspray
Because of all the recent attention paid to Travolta-in-drag, I decided to go the other way and watch the John Waters' directed original. Now, normally John Waters is a director that I would go out of my way to avoid. Having caught even just five minutes of his horrific 1972 film Pink Flamingos, if I saw the man coming down the street I would probably run. The guy freaks me out. Apparently I saw another of his films previously without even realizing it too, Serial Mom, back when I was a kid. Now that I think about it, it makes sense. It's a wackjob film. It fits his emo. The only other film he's ever made that I have any remote interest in is Cry-Baby, but only because of Johnny Depp.

That said, Hairspray wasn't wholly terrible. It's definitely odd, but it's got an underdog charm and implausability that appealed to me. The whole Tracy Turnblad character succeeds in spite of any physical flaws she may have and that Waters seems to not even notice or embraces them (having Tracy bite into a snowball dessert while modeling plus-sized outfits?) adds to the naivete - and enjoyment, really - of the film.

I don't want to overpraise this film, because it really was pretty average, but there were things about it that were unusual and welcome. The acting, however, was not one of them. It's pretty dreadful, even considering they're supposed to be playing it over-the-top. But when you've got a crossdresser named Divine playing two roles in the film, what do you expect? Plus it had the good sense to keep it short (under 90 minutes)... something most films nowadays can't even come close to.

I don't know if I'm more interested or less interested in seeing the Adam Shankman version now. Waters' film is campy but has a racial undercurrent that I'd be surprised made it into the updated version (can anyone tell me if it did/didn't?). Like I said, I'm not really recommending nor dissuading anyone from seeing Hairspray. It's harmless enough to make it easily consumed, but I doubt if anyone's gonna really remember it as anything more than that.

(side note: If anyone has seen this film and played the classic Genesis video game "ToeJam & Earl" try to tell me that the 'crazy dentist' character from that game isn't just Waters' role as the 'crazy psychiatrist' in this film. Try to tell me differently).

Breach
My favorite of my recent watches. You can tell this was directed by the same guy (Billy Ray) who did Shattered Glass, which is a good thing. It's a tight movie. Sharp dialouge. Interesting characters. A fascinating storyline and some great performances (especially Chris Cooper, but Ryan Philippe is pretty solid as well). In those aspects, it's pretty much Shattered Glass all over again.

Billy Ray even goes so far as to take a much-maligned actor (Ryan Philippe this time instead of Hayden Christensen) and wrangle another good performance out of him. I'm not a Philippe hater though, I thought he was the best part of Flags of Our Fathers and one of the better parts of the much-overrated Crash. He shows ability. He's not flashy and I wouldn't categorize him as a great actor, but his being in a film is not going to dissuade me from seeing it. He'll never be a top-of-the-line talent, but he's good enough to warrant the roles he gets and he can be a nice addition to an ensemble cast.

And Cooper is great as always. It's basically his C.I.A. role from the original Bourne Identity if it was elaborated, he was a little more beaten down and he'd been pushed towards retirement but Cooper does great things in this role. He always seems to shine when given a chance. Lone Star, American Beauty, Adaptation... you give this guy a role and he'll work wonders with it. I'll agree with chachi from a while back, this one is a definite watch for anyone who hasn't seen it.

Bobby
Emilio Estevez's heart was in the right place. His script just wasn't all that good. It's okay. It's subject matter is interesting. The way he decided to do it, portraying the people at the hotel on the day of the assassination instead of focusing directly on Robert F. Kennedy, was an interesting twist. I think it takes away from the film truthfully, but it was an interesting decision nonetheless. Bobby Kennedy was what was the draw to this story though. That these people revered him and admired him isn't that compelling, it's his assassination and why it happened that is... but that's largely ignored.

Then the rest of the story is broken down into segments because we're told what amounts to a series of short stories about characters that really aren't very important. While Shia LeBeouf can act, seeing him strung out on LSD for an entire movie and then regretting not going door-to-door to promote Bobby isn't really a story. It's just something that happens, it doesn't amount to anything and then Bobby dies. Same goes for a lot of the things that happen in this movie. Demi Moore's Virginia Fallon is a drunk and a floundering singer, that's about all I learned about her. Except maybe she has a big wig and a sadsack husband (Estevez). Anthony Hopkins plays chess and greets Bobby at the door. But nothing is being said here. It's just what happened.

This film would have benefitted greatly from Paul Greengrass's cinema verite style. That way it would feel real. It would feel like Bloody Sunday or United 93. Instead, we get a dramatic rendering of the day that ultimately feels hollow. Greengrass never tried to explain the events of those two films, he just presents them as best as he can while making observations. Estevez tries something similar but can't hide his obvious regard for the man, nor can he help but amplify the dramatic elements (Macy cheating on his wife, Lohan trying to marry Wood out of his army service, etc.). Again, I don't think it's bad... it just doesn't work. It hides a lot of the intrigue of the event and doesn't even work as a real recollection of the day. A flawed, but valiant, attempt.

The Painted Veil
I probably could have included this as one of the Screening Room Sessions but instead I just went ahead and checked it out on my own. My family was around and we needed something we'd all watch... so a nice family film about cholera, infidelity and death seemed as good a choice as I had in my collection.

And you know what? It was pretty interesting and I liked it for the most part, especially the dynamic between Norton and Watts characters. I liked their storyline. I like how their relationship changed along the way, how these two people grew to respect one another and maybe to love one another. There were a couple of predictable points to the story, but nothing that stands out as too detrimental to the overall film.

I gotta say I'm a little surprised that it's IMDB rating is so high though (7.7) but it's a solid little film, much in keeping with John Curran's last film about relationships We Don't Live Here Anymore. And much like that film, Naomi Watts gives another very good performance. She's an interesting actress. Kind of muted - meaning that she's not real showy, she's not meant for your typical romantic comedy type of film. But in films like this, or 21 Grams or even King Kong she has a sincere, very human quality that I enjoy. She knows how to ground her characters so that they seem like everyday people. She's relatable. Anyways, another solid B film.

Alright. Those are my most recent watches, what are yours?

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Month of Movies: August 2007


Glancing through August there isn't a whole lot of films that I'm dying to see... not like September and October seem to be, where there are as many as three films per weekend I want to catch. There are some big budget comedies and sequels coming our way like Rush Hour 3 (a film at least two years later than it has any right to be for showing up in theaters) and the sequel no one was asking for - not even Eddie Murphy - with Daddy Day Camp. Underdog looks entirely unappealing in spite of the vocal talents of Jason Lee and The Invasion seems passable but surprisingly uncompelling for Daniel Craig's Bond follow-up. Never been a huge Mr. Bean fan, so Mr. Bean's Holiday is nothing to look forward to either. And War? With Jason Statham and Jet Li? Another I'll pass on. Meanwhile, I've heard next to nothing about Death Sentence with Kevin Bacon, The Nanny Diaries with Scarlett Johansson and the little from Hot Rod and Balls of Fury might have been more than enough for me.

So what is there?

Well, I'll finally get to gush all over The Bourne Ultimatum this weekend. I'm already convinced pre-watch that it concludes the best action series in film history (fight me with your Die Hard and Lethal Weapon arguments all you want, they don't hold up).

Unfortunately, that's the only film I'm dying for.

Other choices include Superbad, whose early reviews seem to indicate it's another piece of comedic gold that Seth Rogen was involved in. I'm there too.

Stardust and Resurrecting the Champ, ditto, are getting positive early reviews and becoming more appealing by the minute. I'm a tough sell on fantasy films though - I didn't even see The Fellowship of the Ring until it came out on DVD, so Matthew Vaughn has his work cut out for him if he expects to see me in theaters come opening night - despite that I loved his last film, Layer Cake. And Champ is getting big buzz for Samuel L. Jackson whose apparently acting again since Black Snake Moan, after taking a couple years off to make mostly cruddy sci-fi and action films.

And then there's Rob Zombie. Say what you will, but The Devil's Rejects was some kind of film. What kind, I don't know. And I don't know what in the world to think of a Zombie-fied Halloween (I like the Carpenter version just fine, thank you). But still... it intrigues me. Maybe not enough for a theater visit, but definitely enough to check out on DVD when it hits.

So, who's seeing what?

Blog Directory - Blogged